Huh!

[Sarah_3420]

true thanks again

 

[Irfan Atique]

true thanks again

its an honor

 

[Lilly2318]

DEAR LILLY IF YOU ARE ASKING ME TO ANSWER THAN M REALLY SORRY FOR I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS COZ PEOPLE DISRESPECTED ME AND HUMILIATED ME SO M SORRY!

Now can u plzzzzzz answer meee.....plzzzzzzzzz!
-WAT WAS THE IMPACT OF WORLD WAR 1 ON THE PPL OF SUBCONTINENT? ( BRITISH RULERS + INDIANS)
2- WHY DID CONGRESS REJECTED MORLEY MINTO REFORMS?
3- WHY DID ML AND INC REJECTED MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD REFORMS?
4- WHY WAS THE QUIT INDIA MOVEMENT SATRTED?

 

[Lilly2318]

and what was the august offer?

 

[Irfan Atique]

Now can u plzzzzzz answer meee.....plzzzzzzzzz!
-WAT WAS THE IMPACT OF WORLD WAR 1 ON THE PPL OF SUBCONTINENT? ( BRITISH RULERS + INDIANS)
2- WHY DID CONGRESS REJECTED MORLEY MINTO REFORMS?
3- WHY DID ML AND INC REJECTED MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD REFORMS?
4- WHY WAS THE QUIT INDIA MOVEMENT SATRTED?

Question: WHY DID ML AND INC REJECTED MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD REFORMS??
Answer: The Montague-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919 conceded far less than the Lucknow Pact had demanded. The Act did not make important changes at the Centre. The bicameral system of legislature was introduced at the Centre but there was no appreciable increase in the powers of the legislature.
In the domain of provinces, Dyarchy was introduced but it was unsound in principle and unworkable in practice. Such concessions were not acceptable to the Congress and the Muslim League. The Indians felt that the Reforms of 1919 had not given them enough powers and they were dissatisfied with them. The Rowlett Act, the Jullianwala Bagh Tragedy, Martial Law and other sad happenings added to the resentment and bitterness of the people.The political circles declared these reforms as inadequate and unsatisfactory. Congress split into two factions over the question of accepting the Reforms, one group was in favour of accepting the Reforms while the other was for rejecting them. Muslim League too, was not very optimistic about the proposals as they did not contain any concrete suggestions about the introduction of self-rule in India. Thus the reforms introduced by the Act of 1919 failed to satisfy the people of India and the people did not think the 1919 Reforms worth for any consideration of attention.
Question: Why did the congress party oppose the Morley Minto reforms of 1909? [7]
Answer: There were several reasons for congress opposition of Morley Minto Reforms 1909. According to these reforms separate electorate was granted for Muslims which the congress did not like. Secondly, since the congress demanded self-rule, it was not satisfied with the very limited powers given to viceroy’s legislative assembly.
The British intended that the Indians could voice their opinions in the councils but the Hindus wanted more responsibility which the government was not prepared to give. This annoyed the Hindus who were looking towards self-rule. The British accepted the right of Muslims to have separate electorates which also annoyed the Hindus who saw it as a concession too far because Congress was in favor of joint electorates. The Congress claimed that it represented all Indian people and that separate electorate was undemocratic. Again self-rule was the goal for the whole country with the Hindus as the dominant force. The Hindus also resented the relative high position of Muslims in the councils despite their much smaller numbers. The method of election was also criticized. The Viceroy’s council had no real power and could only discuss and debate an issue and present their opinion in the form of suggestions. The real power rested with the Viceroy and the Governors of provinces. So on these grounds Congress opposed the Morley-Minto reforms of 1909.

 

[Irfan Atique]

Question: WHY DID ML AND INC REJECTED MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD REFORMS??
Answer: The Montague-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919 conceded far less than the Lucknow Pact had demanded. The Act did not make important changes at the Centre. The bicameral system of legislature was introduced at the Centre but there was no appreciable increase in the powers of the legislature.
In the domain of provinces, Dyarchy was introduced but it was unsound in principle and unworkable in practice. Such concessions were not acceptable to the Congress and the Muslim League. The Indians felt that the Reforms of 1919 had not given them enough powers and they were dissatisfied with them. The Rowlett Act, the Jullianwala Bagh Tragedy, Martial Law and other sad happenings added to the resentment and bitterness of the people.The political circles declared these reforms as inadequate and unsatisfactory. Congress split into two factions over the question of accepting the Reforms, one group was in favour of accepting the Reforms while the other was for rejecting them. Muslim League too, was not very optimistic about the proposals as they did not contain any concrete suggestions about the introduction of self-rule in India. Thus the reforms introduced by the Act of 1919 failed to satisfy the people of India and the people did not think the 1919 Reforms worth for any consideration of attention.
Question: Why did the congress party oppose the Morley Minto reforms of 1909? [7]
Answer: There were several reasons for congress opposition of Morley Minto Reforms 1909. According to these reforms separate electorate was granted for Muslims which the congress did not like. Secondly, since the congress demanded self-rule, it was not satisfied with the very limited powers given to viceroy’s legislative assembly.
The British intended that the Indians could voice their opinions in the councils but the Hindus wanted more responsibility which the government was not prepared to give. This annoyed the Hindus who were looking towards self-rule. The British accepted the right of Muslims to have separate electorates which also annoyed the Hindus who saw it as a concession too far because Congress was in favor of joint electorates. The Congress claimed that it represented all Indian people and that separate electorate was undemocratic. Again self-rule was the goal for the whole country with the Hindus as the dominant force. The Hindus also resented the relative high position of Muslims in the councils despite their much smaller numbers. The method of election was also criticized. The Viceroy’s council had no real power and could only discuss and debate an issue and present their opinion in the form of suggestions. The real power rested with the Viceroy and the Governors of provinces. So on these grounds Congress opposed the Morley-Minto reforms of 1909.

Questions: What was August offer? [4]
The August offer 1940 was made on August 8, 1940, the eve of the Battle of Britain. The Viceroy at the time, Lord Linlithgow, made a fresh offer that promised the expansion of the governor-general's Executive Council to include more Indians, the Establishment of an Advisory War council, giving full weight to minority opinion, recognition of Indians' right to frame their own constitution (after the war would end). In return, it was hoped that all parties and communities in India would cooperate in Britain's war efforts. 6- What was the August Offer?

 

[Irfan Atique]

Questions: What was August offer? [4]
The August offer 1940 was made on August 8, 1940, the eve of the Battle of Britain. The Viceroy at the time, Lord Linlithgow, made a fresh offer that promised the expansion of the governor-general's Executive Council to include more Indians, the Establishment of an Advisory War council, giving full weight to minority opinion, recognition of Indians' right to frame their own constitution (after the war would end). In return, it was hoped that all parties and communities in India would cooperate in Britain's war efforts. 6- What was the August Offer?

Question: Why was the ‘Quit India’ Movement formed in 1942? [7]
Answer: Amidst World War II, on 8th August 1940, the British Government announced dominion status to India through its famous 'August Offer' which was rejected by the Indians. The Cripps Mission of 1942 was another step ahead which suggested full dominion status to India and also the right to secede from the British Commonwealth of Nations. This proposal was also rejected by the people of India.
As both the Congress and the league rejected the Cripps mission, because League wanted the partition and congress wanted the immediate and full control over the Government. The British were in the middle of the war and were in a very crucial situation which congress exploited by demanding the British to leave India. So The Quit India Resolution was passed on August, 1942 by the All India Congress Committee, at Bombay that urged for the immediate end of the British rule in India.
Addressing the people of India, Gandhi told, "Every one of you should from this moment onward consider yourself a free man or woman and act as if you are free.... I am not going to be satisfied with anything short of complete freedom. We shall do or die. We shall either free India or die in the attempt." To Gandhi, it was last struggle of his life to win the freedom of India. In the next day, the prominent Congress leaders including Gandhi were behind the bars. Thus began strikes, processions, meetings and functions by the Indians all over the country. The Government, unaware of the change of Indian mind, started repressive measures to quell movement. In this second stage, the people went ahead and attacked railway stations, post offices, police stations etc.

 

[Nabeel.Ahmad]

The INC opposed the Morley Minto Reforms on account of a no. of reasons:

→ Muslims got SEPERATE ELECTORATES AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION [Congress could not see the Muslims prosper]
→ Indians in councils had no decisive power
→ In order to put further pressure on the British as they were already in opposition to Partition of Bengal
→ Indians did not Get SELF RULE, that was the Congress Demand
→ Congress wanted REAL POWER, which was not granted by these reforms. The British cleverly gave them limited power.
→ The INC considered these reforms undemocratic.

Elaborate all these.. to get 7/7.

 

[Uno_Fantasy]

(b) What does the Prophet’s first experience of revelation tell us about the nature of
prophethood in Islam? (4)

 

[Irfan Atique]

(b) What does the Prophet’s first experience of revelation tell us about the nature of
prophethood in Islam? (4)

Question: What does the Prophet’s (S.A.W) first experience of revelation tells us about the nature of Prophet Hood in Islam? [4]
Answer: In Islamic terminology revelation or Wahi means, God’s divine message conveyed to God’s chosen person (Prophets). The revelation cane be conveyed openly or in a hidden and concealed manner, like hearing of the bell, dreams, God’s personal talking To messengers like with Musa (A.S) and Prophet (S.A.W) (the Isra wa-Mi’raj) and revelation brought by angels in the form of man or angel, like the Holy Prophet (S.A.W) first (S.A.W) Jibrael (A.S) in the form of a man in the cave of Hira when he received the first revelation.
The unexpected experience of Prophet (S.A.W) and his confusion when he (S.A.W) angel Jibrael in angelic form; same was happened to Hazrat Musa (A.S) when he went to the Mountain of Tour when he went to the mountain to fetch fire but surprised and confused upon hearing God’s direct voice and revelation about his prophecy. Allah says in the Holy Quran “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message). I am not with you” (8:12 Again Allah says “Nor does he say out of his own desire, it is no less than inspiration sending to him.” (53:3-4)
As when Hazrat Merriam (A.S) brought Hazrat Isa (A.S) into this world, Hazrat Isa only few days old spoke the truth about his mother being pure women (Surah Merriam). So the first experience of Prophet (S.A.W) shows that God chose Prophets often without warning and that they are best among their people morally and intellectually and they belong to the noble ancestors.

 

[Uno_Fantasy]

Question: What does the Prophet’s (S.A.W) first experience of revelation tells us about the nature of Prophet Hood in Islam? [4] answer..

Jazak Allah sir.

 

[asadalam]

Question: What does the Prophet’s (S.A.W) first experience of revelation tells us about the nature of Prophet Hood in Islam? [4]
Answer: In Islamic terminology revelation or Wahi means, God’s divine message conveyed to God’s chosen person (Prophets). The revelation cane be conveyed openly or in a hidden and concealed manner, like hearing of the bell, dreams, God’s personal talking To messengers like with Musa (A.S) and Prophet (S.A.W) (the Isra wa-Mi’raj) and revelation brought by angels in the form of man or angel, like the Holy Prophet (S.A.W) first (S.A.W) Jibrael (A.S) in the form of a man in the cave of Hira when he received the first revelation.
The unexpected experience of Prophet (S.A.W) and his confusion when he (S.A.W) angel Jibrael in angelic form; same was happened to Hazrat Musa (A.S) when he went to the Mountain of Tour when he went to the mountain to fetch fire but surprised and confused upon hearing God’s direct voice and revelation about his prophecy. Allah says in the Holy Quran “Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message). I am not with you” (8:12 Again Allah says “Nor does he say out of his own desire, it is no less than inspiration sending to him.” (53:3-4)
As when Hazrat Merriam (A.S) brought Hazrat Isa (A.S) into this world, Hazrat Isa only few days old spoke the truth about his mother being pure women (Surah Merriam). So the first experience of Prophet (S.A.W) shows that God chose Prophets often without warning and that they are best among their people morally and intellectually and they belong to the noble ancestors.

Do you teach Islamiat or History ?

 

[Irfan Atique]

Do you teach Islamiat or History ?

Major is Islamiat, and Minor is his

 

[starship]

1. Why did Jinnah produce his 14 points . (7)
2. Why was it necessary to promote the regional languages . (7)
3. Why did Jinnah leave congress? (7)
4. why were the muslims of India blamed for1857?(7)
5. why did the muslims of india decide to migret to Afghanistan?(7)
6. why did the hijrat movement failed?(7)
7. why did British leave india finally?(7)
8. why was Jinnah considered as ambassador of hindi muslim unity? (7)
9. why was nehru report issued?(7)
10. who wa tatya toppe?(4)
    pleas answer them need them urgent

 

[Lilly2318]

So ppl HOW WAST TODAY'S PAPER WENT! MINE WAZ GOOOD . LETS HOPE FOR BEST
I HAVE JUST THIS ONE PROBLEM THAT A QUESTION ASKED THE EVENTS OF 1ST HIJRI
I WROTE ABT MASJID E NABWI , MUWAKHAT AND BROTHERHOOD!
IS IT ENUF CUZ I THINK I HAVE LEFT SOMETHING OuT SUCH AS BILAL BEING APPOINTED AS MUEZZIN
and in the conquest of makkah i did not mention general pardon will i be able to get 8 in both of them?

 

[asadalam]

So ppl HOW WAST TODAY'S PAPER WENT! MINE WAZ GOOOD . LETS HOPE FOR BEST
I HAVE JUST THIS ONE PROBLEM THAT A QUESTION ASKED THE EVENTS OF 1ST HIJRI
I WROTE ABT MASJID E NABWI , MUWAKHAT AND BROTHERHOOD!
IS IT ENUF CUZ I THINK I HAVE LEFT SOMETHING OuT SUCH AS BILAL BEING APPOINTED AS MUEZZIN
and in the conquest of makkah i did not mention general pardon will i be able to get 8 in both of them?

Dont discuss content and complete questions b4 24 HOURS!!!

 

[Lilly2318]

T

Question: WHY DID ML AND INC REJECTED MONTAGUE CHELMSFORD REFORMS??
Answer: The Montague-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919 conceded far less than the Lucknow Pact had demanded. The Act did not make important changes at the Centre. The bicameral system of legislature was introduced at the Centre but there was no appreciable increase in the powers of the legislature.
In the domain of provinces, Dyarchy was introduced but it was unsound in principle and unworkable in practice. Such concessions were not acceptable to the Congress and the Muslim League. The Indians felt that the Reforms of 1919 had not given them enough powers and they were dissatisfied with them. The Rowlett Act, the Jullianwala Bagh Tragedy, Martial Law and other sad happenings added to the resentment and bitterness of the people.The political circles declared these reforms as inadequate and unsatisfactory. Congress split into two factions over the question of accepting the Reforms, one group was in favour of accepting the Reforms while the other was for rejecting them. Muslim League too, was not very optimistic about the proposals as they did not contain any concrete suggestions about the introduction of self-rule in India. Thus the reforms introduced by the Act of 1919 failed to satisfy the people of India and the people did not think the 1919 Reforms worth for any consideration of attention.
Question: Why did the congress party oppose the Morley Minto reforms of 1909? [7]
Answer: There were several reasons for congress opposition of Morley Minto Reforms 1909. According to these reforms separate electorate was granted for Muslims which the congress did not like. Secondly, since the congress demanded self-rule, it was not satisfied with the very limited powers given to viceroy’s legislative assembly.
The British intended that the Indians could voice their opinions in the councils but the Hindus wanted more responsibility which the government was not prepared to give. This annoyed the Hindus who were looking towards self-rule. The British accepted the right of Muslims to have separate electorates which also annoyed the Hindus who saw it as a concession too far because Congress was in favor of joint electorates. The Congress claimed that it represented all Indian people and that separate electorate was undemocratic. Again self-rule was the goal for the whole country with the Hindus as the dominant force. The Hindus also resented the relative high position of Muslims in the councils despite their much smaller numbers. The method of election was also criticized. The Viceroy’s council had no real power and could only discuss and debate an issue and present their opinion in the form of suggestions. The real power rested with the Viceroy and the Governors of provinces. So on these grounds Congress opposed the Morley-Minto reforms of 1909.

Thank u sir!

 

[Lilly2318]

The INC opposed the Morley Minto Reforms on account of a no. of reasons:

→ Muslims got SEPERATE ELECTORATES AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION [Congress could not see the Muslims prosper]
→ Indians in councils had no decisive power
→ In order to put further pressure on the British as they were already in opposition to Partition of Bengal
→ Indians did not Get SELF RULE, that was the Congress Demand
→ Congress wanted REAL POWER, which was not granted by these reforms. The British cleverly gave them limited power.
→ The INC considered these reforms undemocratic.

Elaborate all these.. to get 7/7.

Thnx

 

[Lilly2318]

i d

Dont discuss content and complete questions b4 24 HOURS!!!

ont get wat u mean? cuz today was isl 2058/1

 

[asadalam]

i d
ont get wat u mean? cuz today was isl 2058/1

https://www.xtremepapers.com/community/threads/no-paper-discussion-before-24hrs.2756/