We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Yes correctYes it was mentioned
Though i wrote about it had greater area and less resistivity is that correct?
in the question related to doppler effect , even though the source was going far from the observer but its velocity was decreasing .. when we considered till 8s as mentioned in question. so should'nt the frequency increase
The minimum marks you had in AS were 88, but you must have gotten more as the threshold was for P2 was quite low. Now if you get even 80 and 22, thats an easy A* hopefully. Makes the total around 190.PLZ HELP ME
i got an A overall in AS
but a B in p3
n in MCQs i got an A but m sure it was a close one
my theory went fine...ill get an 80 or above that
but i messed up my p5
i might get 21 or 22
can i still get an A*?
Zaki ali asghar Holmes haithsoul Error Syntax guys plz help
Yes it was mentioned
Though i wrote about it had greater area and less resistivity is that correct?
yh sameI am in a similar situation here. expecting around 25-26 in P5. 80+ in P4. I hate myself for messing up Q2 slightly today
which parts did u mess up?yh same
it went bad for me n m relying on ecf now
i think the gt will come down to 20 this year
which parts did u mess up?
yh same
it went bad for me n m relying on ecf now
i think the gt will come down to 20 this year
was today's p52 a bit difficult? question 1 was definitely not simple. q2 had a confusing last problem as well. a different kinda questionyh same
it went bad for me n m relying on ecf now
i think the gt will come down to 20 this year
was today's p52 a bit difficult? question 1 was definitely not simple. q2 had a confusing last problem as well. a different kinda question
any did p51? how did you guys find it? was it difficult?
They said that length was the same for both wires so you would lose one mark. Greater area is correct, and the other correct ans was less resistivity.I wrote greater area and less length? Is it correct?
You would lose both marks for that part since your formula/working would be incorrect and your final answer too. For the next question, you would also lose the mark unless you somehow said that the observed frequency would increase(the correct answer). Even if you wrote that observed frequency would increase, your explanation for it would be incorrect(it was a state and explain Q), so it unlikely that you would get a mark for it. So you would lose 3 in total. You can lose 2 marks at max for not using the right no. of significant figures. You lose 1 mark if you got significant figures incorrect a few times, and you would lose 2 if you got the no. of significant incorrect frequently.guys in the doppler effect question.....i used - instead of + (automatically meaning my final answer and the next part of the questions are wrong) so total of 5...how many marks will i lose? And one more doubt, i didnt round my values (because i solved fm18 yesterday and the ms accepted unrounded answers) so is it fine?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now