• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
View attachment 59421
Hey,
Could anyone please provide me with the reasoning for the following questions of the photoelectric effect:
a) In graph 2 why does increase in frequency cause current to increase at a decreasing rate?
b)In graph 3 and 4 , what does negative stopping potential imply?Like what exactly does it mean?

Please help.:)
a - photoelectric current is the no. of photons hitting the metal causing emission - so it's dependent on intensity and not frequency (E=hf) so as f becomes greater than threshold f, current increases until some time after which it'll become constant as intensity will be constant
b - check here http://www.s-cool.co.uk/a-level/phy.../photoelectric-current-and-stopping-potential
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
96
Points
18
a - photoelectric current is the no. of photons hitting the metal causing emission - so it's dependent on intensity and not frequency (E=hf) so as f becomes greater than threshold f, current increases until some time after which it'll become constant as intensity will be constant
b - check here http://www.s-cool.co.uk/a-level/phy.../photoelectric-current-and-stopping-potential
Thank youuu once again!:) But I have a slight query if it depends on intensity then why does increase in frequency trigger initially an increase in current? Like, The way I am seeing: when we increase the frequency the electrons gain more ke so the flow faster and since current is the rate of flow of charged particles it increases.However,eventually what happens is that intensity affects the number of electrons emitted per unit time(I am right?:/ :p) so since intensity is constant the current turns out to be constant as nos of electrons are same. Is my analysis correct?:p I am confused slightly?:/:p :D :)

Oh and yeah:p the following seems a pretty silly question but the contradictory nature is perplexing me.:p If you have an answer as to what would be ideal?:p
upload_2016-2-23_15-32-7-png.59436

upload_2016-2-23_15-32-22-png.59437

upload_2016-2-23_15-32-33-png.59438

Somehow the answers are contradictory in nature.:/ Should the answer simply be a bright spot?:p

Thank you.:D
 
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
Thank youuu once again!:) But I have a slight query if it depends on intensity then why does increase in frequency trigger initially an increase in current? Like, The way I am seeing: when we increase the frequency the electrons gain more ke so the flow faster and since current is the rate of flow of charged particles it increases.However,eventually what happens is that intensity affects the number of electrons emitted per unit time(I am right?:/ :p) so since intensity is constant the current turns out to be constant as nos of electrons are same. Is my analysis correct?:p I am confused slightly?:/:p :D :)

Oh and yeah:p the following seems a pretty silly question but the contradictory nature is perplexing me.:p If you have an answer as to what would be ideal?:p
upload_2016-2-23_15-32-7-png.59436

upload_2016-2-23_15-32-22-png.59437

upload_2016-2-23_15-32-33-png.59438

Somehow the answers are contradictory in nature.:/ Should the answer simply be a bright spot?:p

Thank you.:D
Yeah the way you're writing it seems right since eventually the intensity is constant so no. of e- emitted is constant so the current will be constant :p
so yep :)
And for the other question that you've posted I have no idea xP
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
96
Points
18
Yeah the way you're writing it seems right since eventually the intensity is constant so no. of e- emitted is constant so the current will be constant :p
so yep :)
And for the other question that you've posted I have no idea xP


Thank youuu.:D Cool, lol no problem.:) :D :p :D
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
96
Points
18
Okay so could anyone help me out with the three questions, my structured paper 4 is tomorrow, please help.:D :) :p
upload_2016-2-25_11-20-57.png
Ms:)
upload_2016-2-25_11-21-10.png

upload_2016-2-25_11-21-46.png

Part iii please :p
upload_2016-2-25_11-22-18.png

Ms:). I am clueless why they have multiplied the transmitted and reflected intensities and also why squaring is taking place.:p :>
upload_2016-2-25_11-23-25.png

upload_2016-2-25_12-6-17.png

In the second part, how do we know the mass is same it's not mentioned as such?:)
upload_2016-2-25_12-7-26.png
Ms:)
upload_2016-2-25_12-8-6.png
 
Last edited:
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
Okay so could anyone help me out with the two questions, my structured paper 4 is tomorrow, please help.:D :) :p
upload_2016-2-25_11-20-57-png.59459

Ms:)
upload_2016-2-25_11-21-10-png.59460
the error for each calibration is 2% so for it to be 10% it needs to decay by another 8%
S0:
0.92A = Ae^(-lamda*t) ---> i'm gonna use l for lamda :p
the A's cancel out
0.92 = e^(-lt)
now we know l = ln2/t1/2 ---> t1/2 is half life
so ln2/5.27*365 ---> since they want ans in days multiply t1/2 by 365 so l is in terms of days
so l = 3.6*10^-4
coming back to first eqn
0.92 = e^[(-3.6*10^-4)*t]
Rearrange to find t
so it gives 231 days rounded to 230
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
96
Points
18
it says ions of the same isotopes and since e- have a v. small mass, it can be negligible so they'll have a same mass
So can we like,make this assumption whenever the same isotope is given?:D :p

the error for each calibration is 2% so for it to be 10% it needs to decay by another 8%
S0:
0.92A = Ae^(-lamda*t) ---> i'm gonna use l for lamda :p
the A's cancel out
0.92 = e^(-lt)
now we know l = ln2/t1/2 ---> t1/2 is half life
so ln2/5.27*365 ---> since they want ans in days multiply t1/2 by 365 so l is in terms of days
so l = 3.6*10^-4
coming back to first eqn
0.92 = e^[(-3.6*10^-4)*t]
Rearrange to find t
so it gives 231 days rounded to 230

Thankkkkk youuuu so much!!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :) :) :) :p This question was quite different from the norm tho:p Btw if you get the other one too whenever do let me know, please. :D :D :D
 
Messages
65
Reaction score
45
Points
28
Can someone please explain me the following objective of the Physics Syllabus of 2016 :
# Topic : Properties of waves

objective: Describe how wavelength affects diffraction at an edge

I can't find anything related to this in any of my physics textbooks
 
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
Can someone please explain me the following objective of the Physics Syllabus of 2016 :
# Topic : Properties of waves

objective: Describe how wavelength affects diffraction at an edge

I can't find anything related to this in any of my physics textbooks
I can't actually find that objective in the syllabus but this is what it should be:
When a wave passes through a gap the diffraction effect is greatest when the width of the gap is about the same size as the wavelength of the wave
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
96
Points
18
upload_2016-2-25_14-19-13.png
upload_2016-2-25_14-19-44.png

b i) pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ?:D :D
I know the idea of interference and swamping but my doubt in there are specific way to determine what it should be, like could it have also been 10GHz or 13GHz too?:p
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-2-25_14-19-13.png
    upload_2016-2-25_14-19-13.png
    100 KB · Views: 1
Messages
196
Reaction score
39
Points
38
Hey all. I had this doubt. I want to give my Physics CIE AS level exams in 2016 november session. Can I give A levels in 2017 May June session?
 
Top