• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Paper Discusion: Bio/52 & /51

Messages
38
Reaction score
71
Points
18
my answer is correct but instead of the bands I wrote visible flouroscent patches .I dont know what was wrong with me :/
 
Messages
11
Reaction score
9
Points
11
I wrote exactly the same constants :)
But for you 2nd part I wrote because the bands for sample c (treated with both EcoR1 and Hin D3) are greater in number than the bands for respective samples :/

Hypothesis is not correct because less samples taken. yours one is also right (though i'm not confirmed for my answers too)
My logic behind was tht it was asked rather eco r1 had some restriction sites within hin d3 so if some bands had the same movement this proved it.. I considered it.. dont know whether its right or not..
 
Messages
13
Reaction score
17
Points
13
in the two variables being standardised, i wrote temperature and potential difference ?I question 2 the anomalous was W ?The variable being controlled in qs.2 was that experiments were conducted in a glass house ?
 
Messages
116
Reaction score
194
Points
28
in the two variables being standardised, i wrote temperature and potential difference ?I question 2 the anomalous was W ?The variable being controlled in qs.2 was that experiments were conducted in a glass house ?
same here....i wrote the exactly same answers.....what did u write for the two independent variables in q.2
 
Top