Paper Discusion: Bio/52 & /51

[hush puppy]

thanks A TON!!!

 

[Hassam Afzal]

And question 2.

 

[Malik777]

thanks A TON!!!

My pleasure
How was your paper ?

 

[Malik777]

And question 2.

First we should discuss this one ? :S
Infact I'm bit confused about Q2 Don't remember :'D

 

[Hassam Afzal]

First we should discuss this one ? :S
Infact I'm bit confused about Q2 Don't remember :'D

Tell me anything u remember, specially abt percentage decrease and question abt standard error.

 

[Malik777]

Tell me anything u remember, specially abt percentage decrease and question abt standard error.

I think My percentage decrease was in 80's :S If I am not wrong :/
And what was the question about standard error? :S

 

[Hassam Afzal]

What does the standard error show u abt the reliability of the data?

 

[Malik777]

As None of the error bars overlap, so the difference in the two values is significant, so we can say the student's experiment was reliable because as we decrease the nitrogen the enzyme's activity also decreases. (I can be wrong, this is what I wrote)

 

[Malik777]

What does the standard error show u abt the reliability of the data?

what was your % decrease of enzyme activity for y?

 

[Hassam Afzal]

83

 

[Malik777]

83

same value was calculated by me (Y) it was 83.33 but as the question was to the nearest whole number so 83 was the answer Hyna?

 

[Malik777]

what you wrote about that error question ?

 

[shah zaib]

For C (i) i wrote the distances moved by different sizes of fragments. will it be considered correct? :3

 

[Malik777]

For C (i) i wrote the distances moved by different sizes of fragments. will it be considered correct? :3

I dont think it is correct, because different size of fragments move the same distance in all the electrograms regardless of the Res Enzyme used. Only the distance move by different sizes of fragments changes when P.D is variable or AGAROSE is changed. but the investigation was to check the effect of different REs Enzymes

 

[siraj acharya]

As far as I know you should not discuss the paper before 24 hour it has been over so you might be in trouble
god bless !

 

[Malik777]

As far as I know you should not discuss the paper before 24 hour it has been over so you might be in trouble
god bless !

Actually 24 hrs have passed :'D

 

[AmeeraKhan]

What about the nucleotide sequence? Which way did you have to read it? I wrote it from left to right.

 

[Malik777]

What about the nucleotide sequence? Which way did you have to read it? I wrote it from left to right.

I wrote from right to left and complimentary

 

[hamzariaz0007]

For The controlled variables i wrote: 1) keep the concentration of the restriction enzyme constant in all samples. 2) Keep the tempfor restriction enzymes sample constant.
For the One relating that how we can say Eco R1 and Hin D3 have some fragments within themselves (dont know the exact wording though) i wrote some of the fragments from both show same movement..
For the part relating why student hypothesis is not correct.. i wrote the no. of sample is less no repeats so data may be anomalous..
Are they correct??

 

[Malik777]

For The controlled variables i wrote: 1) keep the concentration of the restriction enzyme constant in all samples. 2) Keep the tempfor restriction enzymes sample constant.
For the One relating that how we can say Eco R1 and Hin D3 have some fragments within themselves (dont know the exact wording though) i wrote some of the fragments from both show same movement..
For the part relating why student hypothesis is not correct.. i wrote the no. of sample is less no repeats so data may be anomalous..
Are they correct??

I wrote exactly the same constants
But for you 2nd part I wrote because the bands for sample c (treated with both EcoR1 and Hin D3) are greater in number than the bands for respective samples :/

Hypothesis is not correct because less samples taken. yours one is also right (though i'm not confirmed for my answers too)