Pakistan Studies, Islamiyat and Urdu: Post your doubts here!

[mtahax]

Urdu ??????????????????

 

[***amd***]

What was the complete hadith?
"My community will never agree on ____" ??? .-.

funky brat

 

[Ushnaaa]

The important ones please

You have to go through all of them,basically they are all important.

 

[Faizan Muhammmad]

i dont think so, coz just 2/3 successes or failures out of 6-7 will not do enough according to what i ve been told.

6-7
there are max 5 including reversal of partition

 

[Faizan Muhammmad]

What was the complete hadith?
"My community will never agree on ____" ??? .-.

My community will never agree upon an error

according to wikipaedia and many articles through google

 

[***amd***]

6-7
there are max 5 including reversal of partition

1. Morley-minto
2. Reversal of…
3. Lucknow pact
4. WW1
5. Mont-ford
6. Rowlatt Act

 

[***amd***]

My community will never agree upon an error

according to wikipaedia and many articles through google

thanks bro

 

[Awesome12]

i guess, 10/14

and the actual question was "How successful were British in solving political problems b/w 1909-1919

I wrote about the Morley Minto reforms; they granted Muslims separate electorates, but caused great uprising- an uprising strong enough to reverse the partition in 1911. I also mentioned about the Lucknow Pact; about how in the first time in the period of the British, they had made united demand, Congress proposals and acceptance, but how the British clearly ignore this. Also how Hindus were aiming to achieve self-rule. Also mentioned Montague-Chelmsford Reforms; about how British accepted to give seats, gave greater political recognition, gave princes seats, gave some type of authority to the Indians through transferred seats, but how everyone disregarded it (mentioned the quotes of Jinnah and Congress), and why they disregarded it. Also finished of in a last para, but writing how they were successful and how they were not, and made an evaluation; how on the whole they were not successful
(Resent the fact that I did not mention Rowlett Act). Is my answer good enough?

 

[Faizan Muhammmad]

1. Morley-minto
2. Reversal of…
3. Lucknow pact
4. WW1
5. Mont-ford
6. Rowlatt Act

I wouldnt call exactly WW1 a method to find solution of Indian problem though I said it started in 1914

 

[Faizan Muhammmad]

thanks bro

what? why this thumbs down?
do you want some references as well ?

 

[***amd***]

I wrote about the Morley Minto reforms; they granted Muslims separate electorates, but caused great uprising- an uprising strong enough to reverse the partition in 1911. I also mentioned about the Lucknow Pact; about how in the first time in the period of the British, they had made united demand, Congress proposals and acceptance, but how the British clearly ignore this. Also how Hindus were aiming to achieve self-rule. Also mentioned Montague-Chelmsford Reforms; about how British accepted to give seats, gave greater political recognition, gave princes seats, gave some type of authority to the Indians through transferred seats, but how everyone disregarded it (mentioned the quotes of Jinnah and Congress), and why they disregarded it. Also finished of in a last para, but writing how they were successful and how they were not, and made an evaluation; how on the whole they were not successful
(Resent the fact that I did not mention Rowlett Act). Is my answer good enough?

i'm not an examiner, may be u r better than me.

I wouldnt call exactly WW1 a method to find solution of Indian problem though I said it started in 1914

they did not ask for the *methods*, they just asked "how successful were", so I just included a point that WW1 diverted their attention from british, and that Indian role in British army was important coz of which indians expected more grants from british than they were actually granted so indians were enraged which caused more problems.

 

[***amd***]

what? why this thumbs down?
do you want some references as well ?

.-. :edited:

 

[Faizan Muhammmad]

i'm not an examiner, may be u r better than me.

they did not ask for the *methods*, they just asked "how successful were", so I just included a point that WW1 diverted their attention from british, and that Indian role in British army was important coz of which indians expected more grants from british than they were actually granted so indians were enraged which caused more problems.

did you repeat reversal of partition story?

 

[Faizan Muhammmad]

And what about the RTC one?
apart from simon commisions discussion there was no other reason?

 

[***amd***]

did you repeat reversal of partition story?

no, i didnt.

And what about the RTC one?
apart from simon commisions discussion there was no other reason?

i wrote saperately, like
RTC1: simon comission, nehre report, 14 points
RTC2: failures of RTC1
RTC3: failures of RTC2

 

[Awesome12]

i wrote saperately, like
RTC1: simon comission, nehre report, 14 points
RTC2: failures of RTC1
RTC3: failures of RTC2

 

[Laibaaa]

Do Muhawrat that have already appeared in the past papers repeat or should i skip them? :s please reply asap x

 

[Minahil rizvi]

pl tell me three reasons of congress ministries resignation in1939

=> poimts were rejected
=> india participation in war without permission
=> self rule pressurization
Hope this helps
Ill tell you the points later
Kal urud 2 ka paper hai cie ka

 

[cie shit]

i guess, 10/14

and the actual question was "How successful were British in solving political problems b/w 1909-1919

I did explain the failures and successes but forgot to write about rowlatt act so will I atleast get 12?? I'm so worried. What did u write??

 

[cie shit]

i'm not an examiner, may be u r better than me.

they did not ask for the *methods*, they just asked "how successful were", so I just included a point that WW1 diverted their attention from british, and that Indian role in British army was important coz of which indians expected more grants from british than they were actually granted so indians were enraged which caused more problems.

I also wrote this point when I wrote about the failures of montford report.