• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

How was physics paper 33

Messages
438
Reaction score
106
Points
53
lets think about it this way... if metres/grams is plotted against 1/grams... do they have a positive relationship? Take any values you want..
Edit: Remember that our values were in 0.00s and the difference between h.-h increased
 
Messages
339
Reaction score
105
Points
53
okay I need you to answer every question Im about to type:

1) Which string did you hang the masses on? Short one or long one?
2)What was your h. (the fixed one) ?
3)Were your values for (h.-h)/m increasing as (1/m) decreased or were they both increasing or decreasing?
4)Did you plot (1/m) on the x axis?
5)Did your h value decrease by 0.02m or 0.03m every time you added a weight?
I DON'T remember anything:S
 
Messages
168
Reaction score
43
Points
38
gradient 0.0685
y intercept 0.836
k1 = 740, k2 = 550 (i took it in meters)
temp change in cup =3
temp change in bowl =5
Hope this helps u or scares the shit out of u ;)(y)
Like n Reply if ur getting same or something
Gradient 0.05
Y intercept 0.47
Temp change in cup 5
Temp change in bowl 9 :D
 
Messages
103
Reaction score
28
Points
28
My temperature change for both was approximately the same too, at around 4 degrees. Is that alright?
 
Messages
267
Reaction score
184
Points
43
Guys i asked my sir he said for those who got a negative gradient only 1 mark will be deducted. People who mostly got the negative gradient didn't measure the First height accuratelyy..this is the truth !!
no, i measured the initial height correctly(usng the set squares) n still got a -ve gradient.
 
Messages
251
Reaction score
54
Points
38
Guys i asked my sir he said for those who got a negative gradient only 1 mark will be deducted. People who mostly got the negative gradient didn't measure the First height accuratelyy..this is the truth !!
I measure initial h correctly with set squares
 
Top