• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Search results

  1. psycoist14

    physics p5!!! fingers crossed!! hopes everything goes well and as expected!! :D

    physics p5!!! fingers crossed!! hopes everything goes well and as expected!! :D
  2. psycoist14

    Computing 32 (how was it)?

    What did you write for the //serial search process?? This was the first line right?? :P " IF Customer (INDEX) = SearchName "
  3. psycoist14

    Computing 32 (how was it)?

    I'm not sure about the values I wrote above though!! :D
  4. psycoist14

    Computing 32 (how was it)?

    LDD 505 which loaded 22 in accumulator, INC which performed increment in 505 and made the value 23 STO 509 which stored 22 in 509 LDD 507 which loaded 170 INC which incremented 170 to 171 STO 510 which stored 171 in 510 END So, the final value in accumulator was 170???
  5. psycoist14

    Computing 32 (how was it)?

    appreciable. however, the question wasn't what it was expected!! total different pattern from what we have been seeing it :/ there weren't theories, only few though. The application part of the theories seemed to be quite difficult for most of the students including me :D
  6. psycoist14

    mathematics help please urgent

    may june 2009 question number 10(ii) please explain briefly... ASAP... thanks :)
  7. psycoist14

    Stat Help

    superbly explained... i've now become crystal clear :D thanks mate.. :D
  8. psycoist14

    Stat Help

    i still didnot get what you meant :( :P
  9. psycoist14

    Stat Help

    i didn't understand you.. please tell more briefly :D and if you can please solve my problem too :D
  10. psycoist14

    Stat Help

    http://www.xtremepapers.me/CIE/Internat ... _ms_61.pdf 5 i explanation required please.. i understood the table though didn't get the calculation. :S
  11. psycoist14

    Stat Help

    haha i found the answer.. lol thanks XPF :P
  12. psycoist14

    Stat Help

    O/N 10 61, number 3 i) how do we find that number in integer..?? i found the probability.. 0958 now???
  13. psycoist14

    Computer Paper 22

    somewhat good.. but was not as expected.. :D
  14. psycoist14

    Computer Paper 22

    i made mistake in the part of ASCII as i was quite confused with the ASCII things.. i wrote 65 would be denoted as 'a' and that would be converted to binary later.. but didn't clarify.. i've done good on the algorithm parts.. though i thought the questions were like specimen paper :P every...
  15. psycoist14

    Computer Paper 22

    i made mistake in the part of ASCII as i was quite confused with the ASCII things.. i wrote 65 would be denoted as 'a' and that would be converted to binary later.. but didn't clarify.. i've done good on the algorithm parts.. though i thought the questions were like specimen paper :P every...
  16. psycoist14

    computing p2 discussion

    the question was quite tricky.. i was expecting the paper to be more or less similar to the specimen paper... at my center every student after the exam were seemed to be depressed as they didn't perform well.. i've attempted all the questions though the questions were not defined properly.. damn...
  17. psycoist14

    computing p2 discussion

    damn it.. i did the same thing earlier.. but thought that it'd end some how.. so got it edited later :@ shit :@
  18. psycoist14

    computing p2 discussion

    when -1 was entered the function returned the value "2". but that is a wrong output ... it can be found by adding an statement which checks if the input is either positive integer or a negative one.. this was the answer i wrote for that factorial question.. everyone tell its right :P please :D
  19. psycoist14

    computing p2 discussion

    hmm.. what is the array?? would you possibly write it? :S
  20. psycoist14

    Computer Paper 22

    could be like 63 i guess.. i calculated the marks that i'd probably obtain, it was 64 :P so
Top