• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

physics help

Messages
760
Reaction score
10
Points
0
if there is a metal wire with no current passing thru it then
A)the electrons are not moving
B)the electrons are vibrating
C)the electrons are moving randomly
D)the electrons are moving in equal amounts in opposite direction

i said D because the net rate of flow of charge would be zero
reply ASAP
thanks
 

XPFMember

XPRS Moderator
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
13,290
Points
523
Assalamoalaikum!!

Well i am not sure but i can just make a guess..it's A
do u know what's the correct answer..is it from pastpapers??
 
Messages
331
Reaction score
43
Points
38
it seems like chemistry rather than physics :shock:

as metal wire has metallic bonding which means that there is a lattice of positive ions in the sea of delocalised electrons.
so the electrons are always free to move whether current is passing or not.
so i think its C...btw whats the answer in the markscheme if its from the pastpaper?
 
Messages
760
Reaction score
10
Points
0
larina said:
it seems like chemistry rather than physics :shock:

as metal wire has metallic bonding which means that there is a lattice of positive ions in the sea of delocalised electrons.
so the electrons are always free to move whether current is passing or not.
so i think its C...btw whats the answer in the markscheme if its from the pastpaper?
yea i know,
so A and B are incorrect, couldnt find the anser any where
and no its not from pastpapers
 
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I think it's A.
If there is no current it means that there is no movement of charge, neither +ve or -ve charges hence this means the electrons are not moving!
According to me..
 

XPFMember

XPRS Moderator
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
13,290
Points
523
that's what i think..but the problem is larina's reasoning doesnt seem to be wrong!
 
Messages
760
Reaction score
10
Points
0
the correct ans is C
quoted from wikipedia
A solid conductive metal contains mobile, or free electrons, originating in the conduction electrons. These electrons are bound to the metal lattice but no longer to any individual atom. Even with no external electric field applied, these electrons move about randomly due to thermal energy but, on average, there is zero net current within the metal.
 
Messages
760
Reaction score
10
Points
0
another question
if u have a closed tube of length "L" the fundamental frequency would be "F"
with an open tube what would u do to the length "L" to obtain same frequency "F"
 
Messages
331
Reaction score
43
Points
38
speed=lambda x frequency
S = L F
same= L x same
so we keep the length same to get the same frequency.

well, i know that this equation is applied for waves, but there's no other equation linking F and L.
 
Messages
760
Reaction score
10
Points
0
they are stationary waves
not use speed=lamda x frequency
there are seperate equations
 
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Points
11
I think its C.its because the delocalised electrons in a metallic lattice are moving randomly.
 
Messages
2,619
Reaction score
293
Points
93
and this is wat 1st chapter of chemistry says......electrons are moving randomly (Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle).......
the things we learn abt current electricity....its like gross simplification....bt random nature is not limited by current...and i dont know wat causes this random nature.......Cshud be anser....and frequecy question....i dint get exactly...
 
Messages
331
Reaction score
43
Points
38
@ahmed yeah thats what im saying, bt there is no other equation which can link frequency and the length except this one.
 
Top