• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Pakistan Studies, Islamiyat and Urdu: Post your doubts here!

Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Points
3
PLX answer these
Who was Titu Mir? [4]
What was the Faraizi Movement? [4]
What was the Swadeshi Movement? [4]
What was the Simla Agreement? [4]

The answers are: hope they help :D

faraizi movement was started by haji shariat ullah faraizi came from the word farz meaning ''duties'' he empazised on religious values and abandoned unislamic practises and told the muslims to live a pious life the movement was later carried on by his sons it ended soon and was confined to bengal only

the hindu reaction to the partition of bengal was so great that they started the swadeshi movement in which british goods were boycotted and thrown into bonfire and people started to wear locally made cloth.other than this lawyers walked out of the courts children were pulled out of schools trains were derailled terrerist activities were carried out eg bomb blasted in london,made an assasination attempt on lord minto thus the partition had to be cancelled

the simla agreement was signed between zulfiqar ali bhutto and indian primeminister indira gandhi in which 93,000 prisoners of wars were realesed on the condition that pakistan would not dicuss the kashmir issue with any worldy powers such as the UNO. This increased bhuttos popularity of bringing home POW's.
 
Messages
125
Reaction score
203
Points
53
no i just want to know wats level 5...
Its a part of level marking system. level 5 is the highest possible level you can achieve in a 14 mark question, so if you achieve this level you are likely to get 14 marks but that is if you first achieve level 4 (9-13 marks) and then write a judgement or evaluation.
Hope you understood.
 
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Points
3
i have a list of 4 mark questions hope they help :) and plz like my post if i helped :p
QWho was Annie besant?
QWhat was the tashkent agreement?
QWho was Mualvi fazal ul haq?
QWhat were the communal awards?
QWhat happened at the simla coference in 1945?
QHow has the Pakistani government help to promote sindhi language since 1947?
QWhat was the 3rd june plan?
QWhat was the Baghdad pact?
QWhat was the press act?
QWhy did Syed Ahmed Barelvi started the jihad movement?
QWhat was two nation theory?
QWhat was allahabad address?
QWho was Chaudry Rehmat Ali?
QHow did Liaquat Ali Khan serve the muslim nation (Pakistan)?
QWhat was the cripps mission?
QWhat was the Simon Commission?
QWhat was the non coperation movement?
QWhat were the Achievments of Khilafat movement?
QWhat was the doctrine of lapse?
 
Messages
98
Reaction score
79
Points
28
dude its from sec 1 :p





the doctrine of subsidiary alliance was introduced by Marques Wellesly. Many small rulers signe it as it gave them security against attack by their neighbours. The nizam of hyderabad was first to enter into such an alliance. Tipu Sultan of mysore refused to do so, but after the 4th Anglo-Mysore war, Mysore was forced to become a subsidiary state. The nawab of oudh was the next to accept the subsidiary alliance. (ans by suchal riaz)
hey thanx :)
but from which book can i find this topic?
 

NIM

Messages
424
Reaction score
145
Points
53
Its a part of level marking system. level 5 is the highest possible level you can achieve in a 14 mark question, so if you achieve this level you are likely to get 14 marks but that is if you first achieve level 4 (9-13 marks) and then write a judgement or evaluation.
Hope you understood.
wat r v supposed to write in level 5....
 
Messages
125
Reaction score
203
Points
53
Dude you are just supposed to write a Level 4 answer, which means explanation of atleast 2 factors including the one given in the question, and then you are just supposed to write a judgement to make that whole answer a level 5 answer for e-g

Q. The main reason why congress rule (1937 - 1939) was hated so much because of the introduction of bande matram. Do you agree? Explain your answer.
Bande Matram a song -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------convert them to hinduism.​
now whole above answer earns you level 4 marks then when you write this ( evaluation)
i think-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------was the reason.
this earns you the level 5 marks.
 
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
2,628
Points
273
thank u.... but what was the plane conspiracy

nawaz sharif feared that the army might take control and a coup led by musharraf( he was cheif of army staff during sharif's rule) would replace him. when musharraf was coming back from a visit to sri lanka on 18 oct 1999. nawaz sharif had ordered the civil aviation authority not to give permission for his plane to land. sharif had then ordered the head of ISI to become the new cheif of army staff but the army refused and took over the airport and allowed Musharraf's plane to land. When musharaf had landed safely, he announced that the army was taking control and Nawaz Sharif and his brother were charged and found guilty on charges of attempted murder, hijacking and kidnapping. They were send into exile in saudi arabia.

hope this helps :)
 
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
2,553
Points
273
'partition or reverse?' Were the reasons for the partition of bengal more important than those of the reversal?Explain (14)

please can someone tell me the conclusion

I hope this haven't been answered yet because Imma answer it my way. :cool:

Here goes;

Bengal was the largest of India's provinces. By the end of the nineteenth century it consisted of West Bengal with a population of 54 million (42 million Hindus and 12 million Muslims) and East Bengal and Assam with a population of 31 million (18 million Muslims and 12 million Hindus). This was a huge area to govern as one unit. The British announced that Bengal is too large to be governed as a single province and that it would be more efficient if it was governed as two units. Consequently, the Indian viceroy at that time Lord Curzon proposed that Bengal should be partitioned into West Bengal and East Bengal. East Bengal was to include Assam and three other districts previously considered a part of the West Bengal, Dhaka, Chittagong and Mymensingh. The British claimed that this would increase administration efficiency but however, the Indian Hindus did not see it from a positive perspective and thought there were more sinister reasons for the partition. Whatever reasons the British had, the most immediate effect of the partition was to create conflict between the Muslims and the Hindus.

Muslims, on the other hand were delighted by the partition. There positions improved overnight. Since 1867, the British had mistrusted the Muslims and had denied them proper education. All the advantages went to the Hindus who even tried to replace Urdu by Hindi. Now, the Muslims had true recognition, a province in which they were in majority. This would enable many thousands of Muslims to escape from the oppression of the Hindus. Furthermore, it reflected the fact that all the work done since the time of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan to restore relations between the Muslims and the British have been successful.

Hindus, however, were not happy with the partition. They believed the British partitioned Bengal as part of their traditional 'divide and rule' policy and that is had nothing to do with administration efficiency. The Hindus had dominated Congress and had begun to call for reform. Many Hindus had this belief that the British had tried to weaken Hindu unity by creating a province with a Muslim majority. This meant that the so-called 'Hindu threat' would be reduced. As the Hindus were outraged with the partition, they soon launched a non-cooperation movement and British clothes, salt and any other manufactured products were boycotted. Instead, locally produced goods were bought. This Swadeshi movement spread rapidly; British cloth was put on bonfires and it became a matter of honor to wear locally produced clothes. In some cities, local workers like those in Calcutta, also launched a series of strikes to demonstrate their opposition to the partition. The British responded rapidly. As a result of this non-cooperation movement, many thousands of political leaders were arrested. Soon Indian jails were full of what British believed were revolutionaries. They censored the newspapers and such Acts were passed that gave British unbelievable control over local media i.e. newspapers etc. But however, the British soon realized that using tough measures to crush the Hindus was not sufficient in themselves. Instead, a better approach would be to win the support of the moderate Hindus by making reforms.

This led to the British announcing the Morley-Minto reforms in 1909. They gave the Indians a greater say in how there country was governed but this too, had its own drawbacks. The British were not so keen to give the Indians a greater say in the government of India and even though the British increased the number of Indians sitting on the councils but it shouldn't be forgotten that their functions were purely advisory. In practice, the actual power was still in the hands of British-only. Opposition from the Hindus towards the partition remained and the British were actually forced to re-consider their previous decision. Soon, the new viceroy Lord Harding realized that Hindus would not stop until the partition was reversed and to avoid drastic measures in the near future, he decided to reverse the partition of Bengal.

On 12th of December, 1911, the decision was announced at a Durbar in Delhi and Bengal was back in its original state. Just how vital it was for the Muslims to have a province with a Muslim majority but the British proved that they cannot be relied. Hence, the ultimate Hindu oppression is something to look into for this change in decision by the British.

Rate? :p
 
Messages
48
Reaction score
476
Points
63
who was haji shariatullah....:-(
so blind in History of Pakistan...

Haji Shariatullah (1781–1840) was an eminent Islamic reformer of the Indian subcontinentduring the Mughal Dynasty. . he was the one who translated quran into persian and wrote 51 books from which hujjatullah-ul-baligah was the most famous one.. He is known for founding Faraizi movement .. afterwards his work was continued by his son mohsin-ud-din..
 
Messages
169
Reaction score
58
Points
38
nawaz sharif feared that the army might take control and a coup led by musharraf( he was cheif of army staff during sharif's rule) would replace him. when musharraf was coming back from a visit to sri lanka on 18 oct 1999. nawaz sharif had ordered the civil aviation authority not to give permission for his plane to land. sharif had then ordered the head of ISI to become the new cheif of army staff but the army refused and took over the airport and allowed Musharraf's plane to land. When musharaf had landed safely, he announced that the army was taking control and Nawaz Sharif and his brother were charged and found guilty on charges of attempted murder, hijacking and kidnapping. They were send into exile in saudi arabia.

hope this helps :)
it does help thankx
 
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
2,628
Points
273
I hope this haven't been answered yet because Imma answer it my way. :cool:

Here goes;

Bengal was the largest of India's provinces. By the end of the nineteenth century it consisted of West Bengal with a population of 54 million (42 million Hindus and 12 million Muslims) and East Bengal and Assam with a population of 31 million (18 million Muslims and 12 million Hindus). This was a huge area to govern as one unit. The British announced that Bengal is too large to be governed as a single province and that it would be more efficient if it was governed as two units. Consequently, the Indian viceroy at that time Lord Curzon proposed that Bengal should be partitioned into West Bengal and East Bengal. East Bengal was to include Assam and three other districts previously considered a part of the West Bengal, Dhaka, Chittagong and Mymensingh. The British claimed that this would increase administration efficiency but however, the Indian Hindus did not see it from a positive perspective and thought there were more sinister reasons for the partition. Whatever reasons the British had, the most immediate effect of the partition was to create conflict between the Muslims and the Hindus.

Muslims, on the other hand were delighted by the partition. There positions improved overnight. Since 1867, the British had mistrusted the Muslims and had denied them proper education. All the advantages went to the Hindus who even tried to replace Urdu by Hindi. Now, the Muslims had true recognition, a province in which they were in majority. This would enable many thousands of Muslims to escape from the oppression of the Hindus. Furthermore, it reflected the fact that all the work done since the time of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan to restore relations between the Muslims and the British have been successful.

Hindus, however, were not happy with the partition. They believed the British partitioned Bengal as part of their traditional 'divide and rule' policy and that is had nothing to do with administration efficiency. The Hindus had dominated Congress and had begun to call for reform. Many Hindus had this belief that the British had tried to weaken Hindu unity by creating a province with a Muslim majority. This meant that the so-called 'Hindu threat' would be reduced. As the Hindus were outraged with the partition, they soon launched a non-cooperation movement and British clothes, salt and any other manufactured products were boycotted. Instead, locally produced goods were bought. This Swadeshi movement spread rapidly; British cloth was put on bonfires and it became a matter of honor to wear locally produced clothes. In some cities, local workers like those in Calcutta, also launched a series of strikes to demonstrate their opposition to the partition. The British responded rapidly. As a result of this non-cooperation movement, many thousands of political leaders were arrested. Soon Indian jails were full of what British believed were revolutionaries. They censored the newspapers and such Acts were passed that gave British unbelievable control over local media i.e. newspapers etc. But however, the British soon realized that using tough measures to crush the Hindus was not sufficient in themselves. Instead, a better approach would be to win the support of the moderate Hindus by making reforms.

This led to the British announcing the Morley-Minto reforms in 1909. They gave the Indians a greater say in how there country was governed but this too, had its own drawbacks. The British were not so keen to give the Indians a greater say in the government of India and even though the British increased the number of Indians sitting on the councils but it shouldn't be forgotten that their functions were purely advisory. In practice, the actual power was still in the hands of British-only. Opposition from the Hindus towards the partition remained and the British were actually forced to re-consider their previous decision. Soon, the new viceroy Lord Harding realized that Hindus would not stop until the partition was reversed and to avoid drastic measures in the near future, he decided to reverse the partition of Bengal.

On 12th of December, 1911, the decision was announced at a Durbar in Delhi and Bengal was back in its original state. Just how vital it was for the Muslims to have a province with a Muslim majority but the British proved that they cannot be relied. Hence, the ultimate Hindu oppression is something to look into for this change in decision by the British.

Rate? :p

14/14 (y)
 
Top