• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Accounting Paper 42.

Rate your Accounts paper 42!

  • Awesome (100-120)

    Votes: 3 8.8%
  • Good (80-100)

    Votes: 12 35.3%
  • Average (70-80)

    Votes: 19 55.9%

  • Total voters
    34
Messages
48
Reaction score
60
Points
8
Property included Lands and buildings? IAS 16 you are quoting is about Property, plant and equipment. Motor vehicle is nowhere mentioned.
http://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/standards/ias/ias16
Also, before going to the IAS, you should revise how entries are posted into Trial balance. If that depreciation would 'not' have been recorded like you claim then how in the world is loss included into trail balance? That is the point I am raising, as far as that schedule is concerned, I messed it up as well.
okay just leave it but can at least tell me what does 1OF mark mean, is it like you get that mark for whatever value you get
 
Last edited:
Messages
48
Reaction score
60
Points
8
man i know to me it is correct and my one also did not balance by 1000, but i had long argument with salmanpakrocks about this
 
Messages
119
Reaction score
185
Points
53
in question 3 to get the profits from the net cashflow depreciation has to be deducted! in the same way is there any adjustment to the interest of 20000 that they pay annually?
 
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
Yup, 30% on 200,000 by reducing balance method?
bro in which year in the cash outflows should we put the 200,000? since its paid fully in year 5 ... we should just include in year 5 only ? o_O ?
BTW i didnt include in year 0 because there was no cash outflow in year 0 . getting a bank loan doesnot mean cash went out ryt ? in year 0 ?
 
Last edited:
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,252
Points
153
[/quote]We had to prepare a schedule for non-current assets. In that schedule, all of the assets value b/d + assets acquired - assets disposed are calculated.[/quote] SalmanPakRocks
But in the trail balance the date was the year ending , so the cost already has assets acquired ryt? o_O they had loss on disposal too .. so we could assume that assets acquired is already included in the balance ? o_O
 
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Points
1
i dont know my paper wasnt so good at all
just comment how many marks were left by you people reply please , or was your paper completed ?
 
Messages
8,393
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
We had to prepare a schedule for non-current assets. In that schedule, all of the assets value b/d + assets acquired - assets disposed are calculated. SalmanPakRocks
But in the trail balance the date was the year ending , so the cost already has assets acquired ryt? o_O they had loss on disposal too .. so we could assume that assets acquired is already included in the balance ? o_O
That's what I've been trying to tell my pals here but no one would understand that.
 
Messages
8,393
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
bro in which year in the cash outflows should we put the 200,000? since its paid fully in year 5 ... we should just include in year 5 only ? o_O ?
BTW i didnt include in year 0 because there was no cash outflow in year 0 . getting a bank loan doesnot mean cash went out ryt ? in year 0 ?
Actually, outflow would be 200,000. The bank paid you the money and you utilised it to buy the asset. So outflow is 200,000.
 
Messages
57
Reaction score
77
Points
18
can

anyone plz tell what is on figure mark, is it like you get that mark for whatever value you get finally
if u carry forward ur wrong answer for eg. the wrong current account balance to the capital account... you will get marks for that amount in the capital account not the current account BUT THE AMOUNT SHOULD BE SAME
and even if ur bal c/d is wrong and u show the b/d so u get marks for the b/d not the c/d
 
Messages
8,393
Reaction score
9,461
Points
573
Bro well majority of the students have multiplied it with 100,000 as there were 100,000 shares (and it was later written that they had nominal value of $1). So they got dividend yield of 4% (seems reasonable), rather than 0.96 % :unsure:
Then I may have done wrong :p
 
Messages
72
Reaction score
31
Points
28
what did u guys get for partner tans bank amount he was taking with him? only 30000 of loan was recorded in cap a/c right because he ws leaving 20000 ?
 
Top