• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Recent content by Afaf el harda

  1. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I didn't solve that one, couldn't :(
  2. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I think I got that as √10/3 how about you?
  3. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I got that too. I hope it is correct. o.o
  4. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I got a 19.5 something, so I wrote 19. I'm not sure of my answer though. =|
  5. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I was 173/200 last year, and last year's exam was way easier, so I suspect it less than that this time.
  6. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    Last question was a pain in the ass.
  7. Afaf el harda

    IGCSE May/june 2012 grade boundaries and mark schemes.

    I think you should check the grade boundaries from previous years and compare. Plus I found paper 22 2012 easier than paper 22 2013, maybe it is just me, but if everyone else thought that too, then they'll most probably be just as low. I really hope they'd be.
  8. Afaf el harda

    IGCSE May/june 2012 grade boundaries and mark schemes.

    Wow, these are really low.
  9. Afaf el harda

    Screwed up physics. PLEASE HELP!

    I hope. :( Thank you. (:
  10. Afaf el harda

    Screwed up physics. PLEASE HELP!

    I have just came out of my physics paper 6 exam, I forgot to take my ruler so I used my set square instead, with 6 cm only. The fact that I had to measure long lengths at two intervals aside. Ii also turned out my set square scale wasn't accurate, it had +1mm . so instead of 4.9 cm it gave me...
See more
Top