• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Search results

  1. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I didn't solve that one, couldn't :(
  2. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I think I got that as √10/3 how about you?
  3. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I got that too. I hope it is correct. o.o
  4. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I got a 19.5 something, so I wrote 19. I'm not sure of my answer though. =|
  5. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    I was 173/200 last year, and last year's exam was way easier, so I suspect it less than that this time.
  6. Afaf el harda

    HARDEST MATH PAPER IN THE HISTORY OF IGCSE 0580 MATH 42 DISCUSSION

    Last question was a pain in the ass.
  7. Afaf el harda

    IGCSE May/june 2012 grade boundaries and mark schemes.

    I think you should check the grade boundaries from previous years and compare. Plus I found paper 22 2012 easier than paper 22 2013, maybe it is just me, but if everyone else thought that too, then they'll most probably be just as low. I really hope they'd be.
  8. Afaf el harda

    IGCSE May/june 2012 grade boundaries and mark schemes.

    Wow, these are really low.
  9. Afaf el harda

    Screwed up physics. PLEASE HELP!

    I hope. :( Thank you. (:
  10. Afaf el harda

    Screwed up physics. PLEASE HELP!

    I have just came out of my physics paper 6 exam, I forgot to take my ruler so I used my set square instead, with 6 cm only. The fact that I had to measure long lengths at two intervals aside. Ii also turned out my set square scale wasn't accurate, it had +1mm . so instead of 4.9 cm it gave me...
Top