I got the primary coil thing but not the link/cut/thread secondary coil part
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
When two objects have an elastic collision, the relative speed of approach is equal to the relative speed of separation.
Is this method valid only when the masses of the 2 objects are equal or whenever there is an elastic collision?When two objects have an elastic collision, the relative speed of approach is equal to the relative speed of separation.
When two objects are moving towards each others, the relative speed of one object relative to the other is given by sum of the speeds of two objects. So relative speed of appraoch here is u1 + u2.
When two objects are moving in a same direction, then the relative speed of an object is calculated by subtracting the individual speeds of the two objects. So the relative speed of separation here is given by: v2-v1
As stated above: "When two objects have an elastic collision, the relative speed of approach is equal to the relative speed of separation. ", the equation for this situation will become:
u1 + u2 = v2 - v1
So answer is D.
When two objects have an elastic collision, the relative speed of approach is equal to the relative speed of separation.
When two objects are moving towards each others, the relative speed of one object relative to the other is given by sum of the speeds of two objects. So relative speed of appraoch here is u1 + u2.
When two objects are moving in a same direction, then the relative speed of an object is calculated by subtracting the individual speeds of the two objects. So the relative speed of separation here is given by: v2-v1
As stated above: "When two objects have an elastic collision, the relative speed of approach is equal to the relative speed of separation. ", the equation for this situation will become:
u1 + u2 = v2 - v1
So answer is D.
It is applicable whenever objects have an elastic collision.Is this method valid only when the masses of the 2 objects are equal or whenever there is an elastic collision?
Just remember a general rule. For finding the relative speed of two objects travelling in opposite directions, you add the speeds. When they are in same direction, we subtract their speeds.Im still confused. When the objects are approaching, they are in different directions and when they're separating, they go in the same direction. so why not A?
I'd appreciate if you couldJust remember a general rule. For finding the relative speed of two objects travelling in opposite directions, you add the speeds. When they are in same direction, we subtract their speeds.
There's a big explanation behind this why we do so. I can tell you that, if you wish.
I explained this thing to another member here, so I'm just copy-pasting that explanationI'd appreciate if you could
Because the current in the primary coil is in phase with the flux in the core <-------- How do we know this??
But not the change in the flux. <-------- change is flux wont be generated as we using ac?
So why does change in the flux not in hase with flux in the core.
Oh my!! I will read it later and ask doubts if I have in it. :3the magnetic force required to produce this changing magnetic flux (Φ) must be supplied by a changing current through the coil. this force generated by an electromagnet c is equal to the amount of current through that coil (in amps) multiplied by the number of turns of that coil around the core . Because the mathematical relationship between magnetic flux and magnetic force is directly proportional, and because the mathematical relationship between magnetic force and current is also directly proportional , the current through the coil will be in-phase with the flux wave.
the primary coil's induced voltage must remain at the same magnitude and phase in order to balance with the applied voltage, in accordance with Kirchhoff's voltage law. Consequently, the magnetic flux in the core cannot be affected by secondary coil current. However, what does change is the amount of magnetic force in the magnetic circuit.
this force is produced any time electrons move through a wire. Usually, it is accompanied by magnetic flux, ( "magnetic Ohm's Law" not in our course). In this case, though, additional flux is not permitted, so the only way the secondary coil's magnetic force may exist is if a counteracting magnetic force is generated by the primary coil, of equal magnitude and opposite phase. Indeed, this is what happens, an alternating current forming in the primary coil -- is 180 degree out of phase with the secondary coil's current -- to generate this counteracting magnetic force and prevent additional core flux.
it is very complicated
u dont need to know a lot of details as its not in our course
so dont worry about it
this is just a general idea
sorry didnt get wat u said0.18 :3
ure ans r always well explained thanksYou already know that the potential at A is 0.20. That means V in = 0.2
You're trying to find out what V out is, assuming there is a "linear" change in the voltmeter reading.
View attachment 60227
With a linear change, the feedback resistance at 15 degrees Celsius is 2500 ohms.
V out / V in = 2500 / 740
V out = ( 2500 / 740 ) * 0.20
V out = 0.68 V
Hope that helps!
The whole needle is moving! Up and down. Like those knitting machines.I can't visualise this question
Which part of the needle is oscillating and how is it oscillating( which direction)? why is the amplitude 11mm? + in bi needle should be at its max height, i get it , but why is this max height 14mm below cloth or 8mm above cloth?
Can someone draw on the figure and explain
Please
biView attachment 60196
Which year is this
Yeah it sure did THANKS!!The whole needle is moving! Up and down. Like those knitting machines.
The position shown in the diagram is the highest position of the needle. They tell us that the needle moves down 22mm and comes up 22 mm. Since the gap between the sharp end of needle and the cloth below is only 8mm, it will poke through it! So to your question:
Why is amplitude 11mm? When they say it goes down 22 mm, they are quoting the distance from the maximum position to the minimum position:
Of course 'wave height' above does not refer to the amplitude, rather it is twice it.
So your amplitude is 22mm/2 = 11m
Now they already told us the maximum position of needle is 8.0mm above the cloth... So what's confusing? The other "maximum" is when the needle has moved 22mm down, so that it's 8 - 22 = -14mm above cloth (or simply 14mm below cloth)
Hope that makes sense
That is just to show the distance through which that block in the top moved as the needle oscillated. They could show it anywhere I guess. The point is just to show wave height.Yeah it sure did THANKS!!
One thing more, why have they shown 22mm label at that point?:/ that is what confused me in the first place
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now