• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Recent content by MahiTheKilla

  1. MahiTheKilla

    Maths P3 9709 32?

    How was it guys? How many did you guys skip/couldn't arrive at the answer
  2. MahiTheKilla

    Mechanics 52 A Level

    Last year the paper was easier than ours but the gt was 30 for A. This one should be around 28 I think.. because I think none of us are 100% sure about ANY of the answers
  3. MahiTheKilla

    Physics 9702 Paper 5 (52) 18/05/2018

    Thankyiou so much! But im scared because the point of q1 is having control over your variables in the experiment and I didnt even mention once on how to collect data for different wavelengths and heights. Injust wrote about what to keep constant and how it could be done. And yeah 4.7+-10% was...
  4. MahiTheKilla

    Physics 9702 Paper 5 (52) 18/05/2018

    I did q1 later.. i didnt mention details about how to vary h like replacing LEDs with different lights, etc :| but i wrote down all the safety precautions and additional details. Also about plotting a graph. How much marks do you think I'd lose?
  5. MahiTheKilla

    Physics 9702 Paper 5 (52) 18/05/2018

    What answers did you guys manage to get in question no.2? I got all the uncertainities in the table by dividing value of nR by 10. My gradient was (3.5+-0.4)x10^-3 ohm^-1 s Percentage uncertainity was 9.1% Value of K (last answer) was 59000+-5000 ohm. Value of C was (2.2+-0.2) mF The error...
  6. MahiTheKilla

    Physics 9702 Paper 5 (52) 18/05/2018

    How was the paper guys? personally I found it quite hard. Couldn't finish it properly on time
  7. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    I think you will get 1 mark.
  8. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    Im sorry to say but if that was the case then how can all the candidates in my exam venue do it using the same method? You might have been misguided a bit. Well dont worry too much, its just few marks. You can spare 30+ marks and still get an A
  9. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    It is definitely in the syllabus, no doubt about that. I've even studied about it days before the exam in Znotes
  10. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    Yes it could be, im sorry. I just remember it being 5. Something. You're correct :)
  11. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    Maybe for gravitational field problems or circular motion, if your first calculation is wrong they will always give you ecf afaik
  12. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    i dont think so.. for 1 mark questions like this, if you get the idea of the whole component wrong, it's the purpose of the assessment..
  13. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    They even got upto 65 bro, expect the same or higher this time around
  14. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    Yes brother. I've been giving these exams from school. AS was done last year
  15. MahiTheKilla

    physics p42 discussion

    First answer was +5.6V, next was -9V (saturated from -18V)
See more
Top